"The Only Good Jew is a Dead Armenian"
The old woman was telling a tale of massacre. She had just heard
of another Israeli family murdered by terrorists, and there were
tears in her eyes as she remembered back those many years. "I had
luck," she said in Armenian. "I hid from the Turks behind a
trellis. I saw my mother and father shot down, my baby sister
spitted on a scimitar."
The old woman, who'd been a young girl in the year Turkey
slaughtered several million Armenians under the cover of World
War One, understood the link between Armenian and Israeli
corpses. Because Armenia, the first Christian state in history,
whose prosperity was a reproach to Turkish squalor, and whose
high culture was an insult to their ignorance, was, like Israel,
an infidel island in a sea of Islam. And for that there could be
no forgiveness.
The Arab complaint today against Jews, while wretchedly tired, is
identical to their excuse for murdering them in their beds:
failure to provide Palestinian statehood, refusal to relinquish
occupied territories. For the murder of Jews to appear
plausible, though, the victims must be stigmatized. Epithets like
Zionist oppressors and Fascist murderers are
used incessantly to browbeat hearers and achieve that purpose.
This is a tactic taken straight from the Ottoman Turks of 1915.
Then, the Armenians were accused of all manner of crimes, from
rebellion to robbery to kidnapping Muslim infants. Exactly how a
civilized people who had peacefully existed for centuries in
their ancestral lands, and whose Christian conversion predated
Constantine, had suddenly become rebels, thieves, and pedophiles,
was never explained. Just as in Germany of the 1930s, libel
preceded genocide. The allegation of babies skewered on
bayonets is a much favored emotional trigger of slanderous
propaganda, which outrage upon truth and trust is more felt than
believed.
Armenians did not help themselves by their passivity in the face
of destruction. Says Vahakn Dadrian in his comparison of the
Armenian and Jewish predicaments, "Jews and Armenians developed
an ethos of submissiveness intended to mollify the agents of
persecution. When the victimizers are not held accountable, that
becomes a source of new incentives for victimization." In other
words, radical Islam, then and now, thinks it can get away with
murder.
Today, one of radical Islam's goals is to despoil the Jews of the
land of Israel. In 1915, the plan of the Young Turks led by the
mass murderer Enver Pasha – a model for Heinrich Himmler
– was to rid Armenia of Armenians by butchering them all
and resettling Muslims there. The Arabs of 2005 would be content
for the Jews to pack up and leave Israel for the Diaspora. And so
they kill them to drive them out. The Ottoman Turks, on the other
hand, would have exterminated the entire Armenian Diaspora if
their reach had been long enough, so deep was their feeling of
inferiority and so rabid their hatred. As it stood,
three-quarters of the Armenian population was destroyed.
The key difference between the two countries is that despite
historic occupation by Romans, Seljuk and Ottoman Turks, and
Bolsheviks, Armenia is today unwanted by anyone. No longer does
it serve as a bridge and invasion route, since the wars of East
versus West have ceased in that part of the world — at
least for the foreseeable future. That war, ongoing in one way or
another since Xerxes invaded Greece, is now transferred to the
Middle East, Israel being correctly perceived by Islam as The
West. And the land of Israel, a harsh, bony spit of desert,
is lusted after by Islam as a woman who is not to be shared with
another suitor.
In the long run, Israel might not be able to prevail, to continue
to exist as a forward-looking, non-Muslim Western state.
Unless the United States continues its massive moral and material
support, beginning under Truman and continuing under the Bush
Administration, sustained through every crisis, the Jewish island
could eventually sink under the heavy weight of Arab populations
and constant assaults — even as Israel gallantly fights a
long slow defeat. Jews could neither conquer their enemies nor
assimilate them, and so would be forced to return to the Diaspora
from whence they came.
Before that occurred, however, there would be many acts of
heroism and valor by the Israelis, and, sadly, many deaths among
them. They would certainly not go gentle into that good
night, but would rage, rage, against the dying of the
light. Therefore it is imperative to the maintenance of
freedom and peace in the world that the rabid, highly dangerous,
but growing anti-Semitism in Europe and America be denounced and
combated by every means and at every opportunity.
The old Armenian woman, my grandmother, having witnessed the
slaughter of her people in the past and the continuing murder of
Israelis in the present, had a foreboding of the future. She
slowly and somberly shook her wizened head. "For Muslims today,"
she said, "it seems like the only good Jew is a dead Armenian."
by Christopher S. Baldwin
... who is a transportation director interested in history, with
numerous cultural and political articles published in The
American Spectator, National Review,
Chronicles, The Leading Edge,
and elsewhere. His short stories have appeared in literary
magazines; and while Night of the Barbarian is making the
rounds with publishing houses, he is progressing with his second
novel, The Butcher and the Calf. His work has previously
appeared in this magazine, where he is also a contributing
editor.
|